King James Version (KJV) Compared to New American Standard Bible (NASB)


Most people try to prove the New American Standard Bible, NIV & other translations wrong by comparing them with the King James Version as if the KJV was the actual original scrolls that the prophets & apostles wrote. But the fact is that the KJV was not written until over 1600 years after Christ went back to Heaven. Other translations cannot be proven wrong by comparing them with the KJV alone. The only way to prove any translation wrong is by comparing it with the oldest, most complete scrolls/codex thus most reliable bibles we have on the planet & also by comparing the words with established & well respected lexicons/concordances. The reason that I say "most complete" is that when we have thousands of tiny fragments with very faint letters, we cannot be 100% sure what letter/word/sentence goes with another. But when we have entire pages of ancient manuscripts/scrolls/codex that are well preserved, we can have more confidence.
King James Version (KJV) New American Standard Bible (NASB)Refer to: Oldest, Most Complete Ancient Bibles & Strong's Concordance
KJV Acts 12:4 "And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people". NASB Acts 12:4 "When he had seized him, he put him in prison, delivering him to four squads of soldiers to guard him, intending after the Passover to bring him out before the people". Strong's G3957 - pascha. Can ONLY be translated as Passover. There is NO WAY this can be translated as "Easter". Some people try to argue that the context is a pagan/heathen/sinner observing a pagan holiday. But that excuse completely ignores the actual word of the original Scripture. It means Passover and there is no way around it. NASB has this correct!
KJV Hebrews 4:9 "There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God". NASB Hebrews 4:9 "So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God". Strong's G4520 - sabbatismos. Vine's Expository Dictionary: "a keeping of a sabbath" (akin to sabbatizo, "to keep the Sabbath," used, e.g., in Ex 16:30)
The NASB has this correct! The NASB is repeatedly more clear in correct doctrine including the keeping of The Ten Commandments including The Sabbath Day.
KJV Exodus 20:13 "Thou shalt not kill". NASB Exodus 20:13 "You shall not murder". There is NO difference between saying "thou" and "you". It means exactly the same thing. One of these word's is not more Holy than the other. "you" is more easily understood by people who are new to the bible and to people from different nations. It is modern English rather than 1611 English. That's a good thing, NOT bad.

kill or murder is Strong's H7523 - ratsach.
I.to murder, slay, kill A. (Qal) to murder, slay
i. premeditated ii. accidental iii. as avenger iv. slayer (intentional)
B. (Niphal) to be slain
C. (Piel) i. to murder, assassinate

It is NOT a sin to kill an animal for food. It is NOT a sin to kill in self-defense. It is NOT a sin to kill by accident. It is NOT a sin to kill the enemy within a war. GOD sent many nations into war. There is a difference between kill & murder. NASB is more true to the meaning of the Original Scriptures.

KJV 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
8 And there are three that bear witness in earth,
the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
NASB 1 John 5:7 For there are three that testify:
8 the Spirit and the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.
A few LATE manuscripts ADD ..."in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. And there are three that testify on earth, the Spirit".
Those words are NOT found in ANY of the earliest/oldest scrolls, bibles. It did not appear in ANY bible until the 10th century or later. Those words have been added by man over time. NASB stays true to the original Scriptures. KJV adds to the original Scriptures.
To this fact, the following other translations agree that these words do not belong in the Scriptures: NLT, NIV, ESV, RSV, DARBY, HNV, MGNT, VUL and many others.
See the verse in the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus. Two of the oldest Bibles on the Planet.
KJV sometimes refers to GOD as "he", "him", "his" "him". NASB ALWAYS capitalizes every word that refers to God., Thereby giving God more Honor and Respect.
In the NASB New Testament, it always capitalizes every word and every letter whenever an Old Testament Scripture is being quoted. This helps the reader to realize that Scripture is being quoted and helps in understanding and study.
The original Greek New Testament capitalized every word and every letter of Scripture. The NASB is more true to original Scripture.
KJV uses "Jehovah" for the Name of GOD. NASB never refers to GOD as "Jehovah". Two Catholic monks invented the name of "Jehovah" around 1270 AD. It never appeared in any Bible version until after that time. It is based on "YHWH" or "YHVH" which also never appeared in Scripture until the Babylonian Captivity of the Jews. Catholics then GUESSED on what vowels to add between each of the 4 letters, even though those 4 letters also did NOT appear in the original Scriptures and Moses did NOT write them. Click Here for proof and more information.
No, the KJV did NOT consider the Greek Septuagint in it's translation. Yes, The NASB DID consider the Greek Septuagint, including the Codex Vaticanus, in it's translation. The Greek Septuagint is the Greek Translation of the Scriptures. Originally, The Old Testament had been written partly in True Hebrew which is called "Paleo-Hebrew". Then, the Hebrews including the Jews, rejected the True One Almighty GOD and went fornicating with the Assyrian and Babylonian gods. Therefore GOD sent them into captivity into Assyria and Babylon. There, they continued to accept Babylonian religious traditions and doctrines. They also adopted the Assyrian language of Aramaic. They translated the Hebrew Scriptures into Aramaic, thereby also injecting into Scripture the names of the Babylon witchcraft gods such as "YHWH/YHVH".
Eventually GOD prepared for the arrival of JESUS and had the Scriptures restored by having them translated into the Greek language which is almost identical in sound and looks as true Hebrew. Jesus and the Apostles used the Greek Septuagint, taught from it and quoted it. The Apostles then wrote the New Testament in Greek. Copies of the combination of the Greek Septuagint Old Testament and the Greek New Testament were eventually distributed. The Codex Vaticanus from the year 350 A.D. is a copy of that Bible. It is called Vaticanus only because the Vatican has that bible on it's shelves at the Vatican. But they did NOT write it. It is NOT a production of the Vatican. It is written in Greek, NOT Latin. It is written in the exact manner and language that the Apostles would have written in.
The KJV translates 4 DIFFERENT Hebrew and Greek words as the one word English word "hell" even though they have different meanings. NASB keeps the original word "hades" (which means the Grave and has NOTHING to do with burning) in ten verses. And correctly translates it as "grave" in 1 Cor. 15:55
NASB keeps the original word "sheol" which means THE GRAVE in Ps.166:3 and other places instead of translating it as the English word "hell".
The word "hades" appears in 11 verses in the original New Testament writings. It means the Grave and deserves to be either kept as the original word or else translated as the "grave" to avoid confusion over doctrines related to hell. The Old Testament word "sheol" also means the grave and has nothing to do with a place of fire. However, when Jesus and the Apostles spoke the word "Gehenna", that DOES refer to the Lake of Fire, therefore can be translated as "hell". The NASB again stays true to the original scriptures.
See article "Truth about Heaven and Hell, What happens when you die".
KJV Mark 7:19 "Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?" NASB Mark 7:19 "because it does not go into his heart, but into his stomach, and is eliminated?” (Thus He declared all foods clean.)" purging= Strong's G2511 - katharizo= I. to make clean, cleanse A. from physical stains and dirt i. utensils, food ii. a leper, to cleanse by curing iii. to remove by cleansing B. in a moral sense i. to free from defilement of sin and from faults ii. to purify from wickedness iii. to free from guilt of sin, to purify iv. to consecrate by cleansing or purifying v. to consecrate, dedicate II. to pronounce clean in a levitical sense

Therefore NASB is more accurate and more clear about True Doctrine.
See article "Proof JESUS DID Cleanse all food meats".

KJV Matt.14:8 "And she, being before instructed of her mother, said, Give me here John Baptist’s head in a charger". NASB Matt. 14:8 "Having been prompted by her mother, she *said, “Give me here on a platter the head of John the Baptist.” KJV makes it look like John's last name was "Baptist", while NASB clarifies that John was "the baptist", meaning one who baptizes.
KJV 1 Cor.15:52 "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed." NASB 1 Cor. 15:52 "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed." Some people try to use the KJV language of "trump" to try to claim that it's not talking about the last of the 7 Trumpets of the book of Revelation. Strong's G4536 - salpigx is THE SAME Greek word used for the 7 Trumpets of the book of Revelation.
NASB makes doctrine more clear, leaving less room for misunderstandings.
KJV 2 Thes.2:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;" NASB 2 Thes. 2:3 "Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction" KJV says let no MAN deceive you. Should we allow women to deceive us?
NASB declares what "sin" is, See 1 John 3:4.
NASB uses the phrase "son of destruction". Perdition means destruction. Many people do not know what perdition means. Many people believe the "anti-Christ" will come as a man of peace. But the bible calls him the son of destruction. he destroys, he is constantly at war in the bible.
KJV Romans 8:19-22 "For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. 20 For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, 21 because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. " NASB Romans 8:19-22 "For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, [a]in hope 21 that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now." NASB more consistently translates Strong's G2937 - ktisis as "creation". KJV sometimes translates it as "creature". G2937 means anything that has been created. Creation is a better and more accurate translation. When we translate it into 2 different words in the same passage, like KJV does, it causes confusion. GOD is not the author of confusion.
KJV Matt.24:15 "When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) " NASB Matt. 24:15 "Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand)" KJV makes it look like we are commanded to go stand there. NASB makes it more clear that the son of perdition will be standing there. Most all Bible translations use the word "standing".
KJV Luke 18:12 "I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess." NASB Luke 18:12 "I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get." Strong's G2932 - ktaomai= I.to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self, to possess.
The KJV translates Strongs G2932 in the following manner: possess (3x), purchase (2x), provide (1x), obtain (1x).
Tithes should not be paid on what you already possess, Only on increase, therefore NASB is more accurate on doctrine.
KJV "God save the King": 1Sam 10:24, 2Sam 16:16, 1Kings 1:25 NASB 1Sam 10:24 "long live the king".
2Sam 16:16 "Long live the king"
1Kings 1:25 "Long live King".
"God" not in the Textus Receptus of these verses, which the KJV is supposed to be based on. So if the Texus Receptus does not include the word GOD in these verses, Why does KJV add them? NASB is more true to the Scriptures.
KJV Romans 3:4 "God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged". NASB Romans 3:4 "May it never be! Rather, let God be found true, though every man be found a liar, as it is written,
"THAT YOU MAY BE JUSTIFIED IN YOUR WORDS,
AND PREVAIL WHEN YOU ARE JUDGED."
The first part of the sentence in KJV "God forbid", is NOT found in this verse in the Textus Receptus. The KJV is supposed to be based on the Textus Receptus. So why does KJV ADD words into Scripture? KJV adds this same phrase in all the following verses: Romans 3:4,6,31; 6:2,15; 7:7,13; 9:14; 11:1,11; 1 Co. 6:15; Ga. 2:17; 3:21; 6:14
The NASB stays true to Scripture.
KJV 1 Kings 20:38 "So the prophet departed, and waited for the king by the way, and disguised himself with ashes upon his face. " NASB 1 Kings 20:38 "So the prophet departed and waited for the king by the way, and disguised himself with a bandage over his eyes." Strong's H666 - 'apher = covering, bandage, a covering of the head, headband, helmet, cap.
In NO WAY does it mean ashes. Almost every Bible translation says bandage or headband. KJV is wrong here. How can we deny this? NASB has it correct!
KJV 2 Samuel 6:19 "And he dealt among all the people, even among the whole multitude of Israel, as well to the women as men, to every one a cake of bread, and a good piece of flesh, and a flagon of wine. So all the people departed every one to his house." NASB 2 Samuel 6:19 "Further, he distributed to all the people, to all the multitude of Israel, both to men and women, a cake of bread and one of dates and one of raisins to each one. Then all the people departed each to his house." Strong's H829 - 'eshpar = piece of meat, measured portion, date-cake.
Strong's H809 - 'ashiyshah = raisin-cake, grapes dried and pressed.
There is NO WAY this means wine. This is an error in KJV!
NASB has it correct!
KJV in Exodus 32:25 says Moses found the people Naked (meaning nude) when he came down off the mountain. This is NOT correct. NASB correctly translates it as "Out of Control". Strong's H6544 - para means "to show lack of restraint" or "out of control". It does NOT mean nude or naked. NASB correctly translates the original scriptures and gives us true doctrine and accurate history.
KJV Rev. 5:9 "And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
:10 And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth".
NASB Rev. 5:9 "And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for You were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation.
:10 "You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God; and they will reign upon the earth.”
Who is singing? From the context and previous verses, it is very clear it is the angels (beast/living creatures). The angels are NOT redeemed by the Blood of Christ. Only humans are. KJV makes it sound like it's the angels who are redeemed. NASB makes it clear that the angels are singing about the redemption of mankind.
Once again, NASB makes things more clear and accurate.
KJV Matt. 6:25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?
:34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

Phil. 4:6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.

NASB Matt. 6:25 “For this reason I say to you, do not be worried about your life, as to what you will eat or what you will drink; nor for your body, as to what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing?
:34 “So do not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will care for itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.

Phil. 4:6 Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God.

thought/careful/worry is Strong's G3309 - merimnao = to be anxious, to be troubled with cares.
KJV teaches people to not even THINK about your life, what you are going to eat, wear, etc and for the future., Whereas NASB correctly translates it as do not "worry", do not be "anxious". The wrong translation in KJV has caused some people to actually be homeless because they think the bible teaches that they should not plan for anything, therefore they live irresponsible lives, not taking any care for necessary preparations, planning and goals. I have PERSONALLY witnessed this in some of the homeless population.
KJV Gen. 28:17 And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! this is none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven. NASB Gen. 28:17 He was afraid and said, “How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.” Strong's H3372 - yare' can be translated as "to fear, revere, be afraid, to stand in awe of, be awed, reverence, honour, respect, to cause astonishment and awe, be held in awe". We must consider the context to apply the correct expression. The definition of dreadful is "causing or involving great suffering, fear, or unhappiness; extremely bad or serious". Jacob may have had some reverence fear but he did not think it was a bad or dreadful thing. It was awesome! Most Bible translations and commentaries agree that the word should be translated as awesome.
KJV Rev. 17:6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. NASB Rev. 17:6 And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. When I saw her, I wondered greatly. Strong's G2296 - thaumazo can be translated as to wonder, wonder at, marvel, to be wondered at, to be had in admiration. We must look at the context. KJV makes it look like John is admiring Babylon, but of course he was not an admirer of Babylon, He was seeing an amazing sight and wondered greatly.
KJV Gen.22:1 And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am. NASB Gen. 22:1 Now it came about after these things, that God tested Abraham, and said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” GOD does NOT tempt. James 1:13 KJV Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man.
It is the devil who tempts. 1 Cor. 7:5 KJV Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
Strong's H5254 - nacah: to test, try, prove, tempt (but NOT in the modern sense of the word), assay, put to the proof or test.
In context, the word tempt is not correct. In context, the word should be correctly translated as test.
KJV: Hebrews 13:16 But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased. NASB: Hebrews 13:16 And do not neglect doing good and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is pleased. Strong's G2842 - koinonia = fellowship, association, community, communion, joint participation, intercourse
A. the share which one has in anything, participation
B. intercourse, fellowship, intimacy
i. the right hand as a sign and pledge of fellowship (in fulfilling the apostolic office)
C. a gift jointly contributed, a collection, a contribution, as exhibiting an embodiment and proof of fellowship

Majority of Bible translations say SHARE. KJV makes G2842 seem like just communication/talking. But it's much more than that. It's Sharing. As in the sense of communion, fellowship, giving in an intimate way.
NASB hints at something greater than talk. KJV limits it to mere conversation.

I could go on and on about how NASB is more accurate in Scripture than the KJV.
I am NOT claiming that the New American Standard Bible is 100% accurate. I am NOT declaring that.
Every translation available to us has errors. But I firmly believe that the New American Standard is the best translation that we currently have available to a large number of people, OTHER THAN THE ALPHA OMEGA BIBLE. I know that GOD revealed the NASB to me and gave me many copies of it so that I could distribute them to people. See bottom of this article for information about The Alpha & Omega Bible which is EVEN MORE accurate than the NASB!

The Creators Name Removed
Most pastors & people who are KJV only activists claim that the KJV is 100% accurate with nothing added or taken out. Yet every bible scholar on the planet (of all religions & denominations) all agree that the true name of GOD was removed from the scriptures & replaced with the words "the LORD" throughout the Old Testament. There isn't even a question about it, we KNOW that occurred! It's established fact! The only debate is what was His True Name that was removed. (Click here for proof what it was). So when people tell you that the KJV is 100% the word of GOD with nothing added or taken away, they show their ignorance of proven bible history.

ACCUSATION: Many KJV only people claim that the NIV & NASB leaves out certain words, sentences & verses which are very important to Scripture. The FACT is that the KJV ADDED words, sentences & verses to HOLY Scripture, the NASB restores Scripture, translating only the words that actually existed in Scripture. Wherever words are absent from the NASB, it's only because those words were absent from original Scripture as shown by the oldest surviving manuscripts. KJV people try to prove the NASB wrong by comparing NASB with KJV as if the KJV was the ORIGINAL Scripture, yet the KJV is only just ONE MORE TRANSLATION of Scripture, NOT THE ORIGINAL! We must compare any translation & all translations with the oldest manuscripts we have available to us.

ACCUSATION: Some people claim that NASB is published by Zondervan. And that Zondervan is owned by Harper Collins which they claim published the satanic bible.
But here are the facts:
The satanic bible was published in 1968 by Avon Books. NOT Harper Collins & NOT Zondervan.
Zondervan was founded in 1931 as a Christian book publisher a& was NOT affiliated in any way, shape or form with News Corp, Avon books or Harper Collins at that time.
Avon Books was founded in 1941 by the American News Corporation.
The satanic bible was published in 1969 by Avon Books, which was owned by News Corp. NOT Harper Collins and NOT Zondervan at that time.
News Corporation bought Harper Collins in 1988-89.
Zondervan was bought by Harper Collins, a division of News Corp, in 1988-89.
Harper Collins was structured under Avon Books in 2010.
Zondervan NEVER published the satanic bible! Zondervan was bought by a company (Harper Collins) which was owned by another company (news corp) who also owned Avon books, which is the one that actually published the satanic bible.
So, it could be said that Zondervan is the nephew of Avon Books. Don't blame something on Zondervan that Avon did.

THE ALMIGHTY has helped me to understand about this. If you shop at Walmart, which most people do, they sell many items that you can use, items which are manufactured by companies owned by sinners, homosexuals & even satanist. It would be ACCEPTABLE for you to boycott Walmart but impossible to find a store that isn't owned by a sinner. Many of the products sold there are completely acceptable to buy & is not wrong to buy them. There is nothing wrong with the products themselves. It's the person who owns the company is the problem. Can we completely remove ourselves from the planet Earth? No, We can't. Zondervan does NOT publish the satanic bible. Zondervan has NO control over what Avon does. Don't blame Tom for what his dad Henry does. Zondervan has published ONLY Christian theme books. What if you found out something about the owner of Walmart & wanted to boycott Walmart? But you loved a GOOD product that they sold. There is nothing wrong with the product, it's just the owner of Walmart. Is it the fault of the product that you dislike OR the owner of a company that sells it? There is NOTHING wrong with the NASB itself.
The NASB New Testament was first published in 1963 BEFORE the satanic bible even existed. The complete Bible was published in 1971. Copyright & trademark to the NASB text are owned by the Lockman Foundation. The Lockman Foundation was started in 1942 by F. Dewey Lockman (St. Jacob, Illinois 1898-1974) & his wife Minna Lockman. It is a nonprofit, interdenominational Christian ministry dedicated to the translation, publication & distribution of the New American Standard Bible (NASB), Amplified Bible & other Biblical resources.
The Amplified Bible (AMP) is an English translation of the Bible produced jointly by Zondervan (subsidiary of News Corp) and The Lockman Foundation. The Lockman Foundation controls copyright for NASB non-commercial use, while Zondervan controls copyright for commercial use. The Lockman Foundation is NOT owned by News Corp nor Harper Collins.

Question: Why is the name "Lucifer" only in KJV in Isa.14:12?
Answer: The word "Lucifer" was never used by GOD to refer to the devil. It was never used in any bible until the Catholic Church translation called the Vulgate by St. Jerome. https://www.blueletterbible.org/search/Dictionary/viewTopic.cfm?topic=BT0002678
The Latin word lucifer just means "light bearer or morning star". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer
The Assyrian bible that the KJV is translated from said "hêlêl or heylel" in Isa.14:12, not Lucifer. The Greek Septuagint that Jesus and the first century church used said "heōsphoros". So the use of the name Lucifer was a Catholic invention.
So NASB translates Isa.14:12 more correctly. The Latin name "lucifer" although never used by GOD/JEsus, has now come to refer to only Satan. Therefore it refers to Satan. NOT Jesus. Some people try to say that refers to Jesus. That's because the people that say that, are evil people. The Latin word could refer to any star of the sky or even to JEsus but that does not mean that JEsus is Satan as some evil people try to claim. It just simply means star or light.

Do you disagree? We encourage you to take your time in prayer & fasting as you continue to examine this subject. Many times, it takes days-weeks, even years to undo man's doctrines or traditional thinking. It's a process. Many times, just reading websites is NOT enough. We must be willing to take the time to talk to our LORD & Savior Jesus Christ in MUCH prayer & fasting, and continual repentance and continued growth in spiritual maturity. We should pray that HE remove all deception from us & always be willing to change as HE continues to teach us. If we have NOT changed anything that we believe in 12 months, we are NOT growing enough in His Truth. We must continue to grow every year until we reach FULL maturity to the full stature of Jesus Christ. Eph.4:11-16. May JE-sus continue to bless you in all of your seeking for His Truth.

Related Article:
Sacred Names, What is The Creators Name? How KJV is derived from Assyrian Babylonian pagan sorcerers.

RECOMMENDED READING:
(I do not necessarily agree with every article and every word on these websites. But I do endorse these particular articles)
-The Hebrew Bible Moses Couldn’t Read
-Masoretic Text vs. Original Hebrew
-What text type or types do the most early church fathers use? Alexandrian versus Byzantium
-Questions For Those Who Believe In Only The KJV
-King James Only Refuted!

Where To Get The Most Accurate Bible Translation
Please click HERE to learn about The Alpha & Omega Bible, in my opinion, THE MOST ACCURATE BIBLE TRANSLATION IN THOUSANDS OF YEARS!


Be Notified of Changes to this website!
Sign up to be notified by text message or email that a new newsletter has been published online. The Newsletters are located at http://proveallthings.weebly.com
Also Receive instant notifications of important breaking news as it relates to Bible prophecy being fulfilled, important earthquakes, newsletters, bible verses, inspirations, etc.
Low message volume. Your cell phone or email will NOT be overloaded with junk messages. You may cancel anytime.
In America, Subscribe today by texting WATCHMAN to 84483.
or click this link: https://www.rainedout.net/team_page.php?a=445d82fb09b684bfaeb4
Text message service available only inside USA.
Email notifications available worldwide.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Click on "Share" and choose Facebook, Twitter or other.

Search I Saw The Light Ministries


Go To Main Page of I Saw The Light Ministries
Over 100 Articles for Your Edification