Praise The Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth! |
LAST UPDATED: APRIL 29-May14, 2013
What is GODs Name? Jehovah, Yehovah, YHWH, Yah, Yahweh, Yeshua, Yahshua?
Are we damned if we use our modern native language in stead of the Hebrew language? Is a person damned if they do not accept the Hebrew names?
What is the Total Truth about the "sacred names" issue?
Must we Do Away with the name "Jesus"? Must we Stop using the titles "God" & "LORD"?
IF you have been dealing with these issues, YOU owe it to THE ALMIGHTY CREATOR and to yourself to read this ENTIRE page and to do MUCH Fasting and Much Prayer before making a decision to SWITCH the worship names you use! This will be one of the most important decisions in your life!
I have prayed and studied this issue VERY in depth, reading many articles, websites, newsletters, emailing with people and speaking with people over the phone. The Almighty has answered my prayers concerning this and has Led me to write this Much Needed article. Everything on this article is well documented and totally proved. Please read the entire article and click on all links to get the full documentation and overwhelming undeniable evidence.
| The very first thing we need to understand is that what people call the Hebrew Language is actually a form of Babylonian Aramaic. It is NOT True Hebrew. They only call it Hebrew because it was the language of the Hebrew Peoples when they came out of Babylon. This is FACT. Notice this chart of the Alphabet Family Free. Notice how "Hebrew" and "Syriac" are brother languages, sons of Aramaic. Yet "Old Hebrew" or Paleo-Hebrew is NOT. They both descended from Phoenician language but paleo-Hebrew and regular Hebrew are of two different branches. Notice also how that Old Hebrew or Paleo-Hebrew is a brother of Greek. True Ancient Hebrew looks and sounds like Greek, they are brothers. Modern Hebrew and Aramaic look and sound alike, they are closely related. | Chart #1: Alphabet Family Tree![]() |
| See how Aramaic Looks like Hebrew The Following descriptions of similarities & differences are from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Aramaic : Aramaic and Hebrew; Biblical Aramaic is closely related to Hebrew as both are in the Northwest Semitic language family. Some obvious similarities and differences are listed below. Similarities Same Aramaic square script (which was adopted to write Hebrew in place of the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet found in earlier inscriptions). The system of vocalization used is the same for the portions of the Bible written in Hebrew and those written in Aramaic Verb systems are based on triconsonantal roots. Similar functions of the verbal conjugations. Nouns have three states: the absolute, construct, and emphatic.
Differences |
Chart #2: Aramaic/Hebrew comparison (Source) ![]() |
Chart #3: Another comparison of Aramaic and modern Hebrew (language of Strong's Concordance & Masoretic text) Source
|
The FACT is that the Original Sacred Old Testament Scriptures were translated more than once. As generations went by and as language evolved and Israel was affected by the evolution of languages and Babylonian and Assyrian captivity, the Scriptures were translated into the language of each era. For example, The Scriptures were eventually translated into Greek during the Greek and Roman Empire and then eventually into Latin during the time that the Roman Catholic Church was at it's height in world domination. Eventually it was translated into German for use of the German People. Eventually into English, but it was OLD English due to the language of the time. Eventually into modern English with the New King James and other modern versions. Time and evolution of languages changed the language of the Bible though different eras. The same was true during the earlier eras. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Hebrew) The Scriptures were originally written in an old form of Hebrew then eventually written into the Babylonian language of Chaldean/Aramaic. Aramaic, the language of Assyria and Babylon, was adopted by the Hebrews when taken captive to Assyria & Babylon. Aramaic replaced ancient Paleo-Hebrew. Examine very closely any hard copy of the Strong's Concordance. Notice the "Hebrew" dictionary in the back of the book. Notice how it says "Hebrew and Chaldean Dictionary". Then pick ANY PAGE of that Hebrew/Chaldean dictionary. ANY PAGE. Look at the words on the page. Notice how it says "(Chaldean Origin)" for not just one word but several words, on EVERY PAGE of the old testament words!!!!!!! The common claim is that the Aramaic language is used only in the books of Daniel, Ezra and a few other places in the Bible. However, if you REALLY study & examine all the facts, ALL of the Strong's Concordance Dictionary of "Hebrew" words are actually of the Aramaic, Babylonian, Chaldean or Syrian languages, NOT TRUE HEBREW. Chaldean was the 11th dynasty of Babylon. Chaldean was the empire of Babylon during the Babylonian captivity of the Hebrew peoples. It is at that time that the Original Scriptures were translated into Aramaic/Babylonian/Chaldean/Syrian. The language of the Hebrew People changed from Hebrew to Chaldean. They adopted Chaldean (Babylonian/Aramaic) words and religious beliefs. The word "Chaldean" means "moon" or "moon worshippers". Smiths Bible Dictionary 1878-1895 (which i personally own a copy of) On page 52 under the word "Chaldea", says that Chaldea means moon in Armenian. Armenian is another language that descended from Aramaic and is closely related to the language of the so called Hebrew of Strong's Concordance and the corrupted Babylonian translation of Holy Scriptures. If Chaldean means moon or moon worshippers, then the Chaldean language is the language of the moon worshippers. The word Chaldea also means Astrology or an astrologer. It is the language of wicca. Witches actually chant the letters. Something else very interesting to me is the meaning of the words following Chaldean in Strong's Concordance. The number of confirmations related to the word Chaldean is astounding! H3778 astrologer, 3779 magian, 3780 covering the flesh, 3781 axe, 3782 fall fail cast down stumble ruin, 3783 ruin fall, 3784 whisper a spell, to inchant (as to chant the 4 letter tetragrammaton YHWH), sorcerer, witch 3785 witchcraft, 3786 witchcraft, 3787 prosper, 3788 success, 3789 to engrave to write to inscribe to record, 3790 write, 3791 something written scripture, 3792 writing, 3793 letter or other mark branded on skin, 3805 capital of a column chapiter (as in the headly head wound revelation), 3803 crown beseige restrain self, 3806 to butt or pound bray (as in the red bray horse of Revelation 6), 3807 strike, beat down to pieces break in pieces destroy stamp (as in the action of the end time antichrist empire upon the whole earth).
Now, let's get one thing straight. There is no such thing as a "pagan language" or a "holy language". All languages are cousins. GOD created most, if not, all languages. However, there are certain words that refer to pagan gods/demons. Both the "sacred names" believer's and i agree that there are certain words that we must avoid and never use to refer to the TRUE Almighty Holy Creator, because there are words that actually are connected and originated with the worship of pagan gods. Our differences lay in the question of WHAT WORDS?
One of the most important Scriptures all of us refer to in the discussion of Sacred Names or concerning the Name of THE Creator, is Exodus 3:14 which in the KJV says "And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you".
According to Strong's Concordance, which is actually a concordance of the Babylonian Aramaic Language (when referring to the Old Testament), the words "I AM That I AM" comes from H1961 H1961: "hayah hayah". However in the Hebrew Bible, it actually said "Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh". (Pronouned I-Jeh asher I-Jeh) Source 1. Source 2, Source 3.
NOT "hayah hayah" and NOT "I Am, I Am".
The original Scriptures DID NOT have the four letter tetragrammaton. The 4 letters shown here
are "Modern Hebrew" which is really Babylonian Aramaic. They did NOT appear in the ORIGINAL Scriptures. Moses did NOT write them. They are NOT Paleo-Hebrew. They are "Modern Hebrew" which did not exist during Moses lifetime. Moses would have written during 1446-1406 B.C. in a mixture of Phoenician, Egyptian and Old Paleo-Hebrew. Modern Hebrew, which is shown in the 4 letter tetragrammaton, did NOT exist until around 400-300 B.C. and descended from Aramaic which did not exist until around 900 B.C. See First Chart above (top of page) and notice the timeline at the bottom of that chart. So, how can we say that Moses wrote the 4 letter tetragrammaton. We Can't! We must admit that the Scriptures were translated from one language to another language during each era, just as we witness in our modern times. We must admit that the original word that GOD spoke (and Moses wrote) was NOT the 4 letter tetragrammaton which people then translate into YHWH or YHVH and then into Yahweh. The 4 letter tetragrammaton and all the translations from it are all babylonian aramaic. The tetragrammaton is actually the tetragrammaton name of Baal. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica 1958 edition, Volume 12, page 996 says "...Yahweh is not a Hebrew name". When Israel was taken away into Assyria, Babylon & Egypt, they adapted to many babylonian customs, traditions, religious beliefs and use of words. The Assyrians and Babylonians even moved into the the land of Israel. ( 2 Kings 17:24) Before Babylon, they kept the Sabbath from sunrise to sunrise. When they came out of Babylon, they were observing Sabbath from sunset to sunset. They adopted babylonian names of months. They had adopted the Babylonian Talmud. They also adopted the names of babylonian gods and kabbalah witchcraft. Smith Bible Dictionary of 1878, page 207 says that moon worship was re-introduced into Israel by Manasseh around 698 B.C. They called the moon, the Queen of Heaven. People offered drink offerings and cakes. This is all related to the pagan roots of christmas and the pagan roots of easter. They even changed their alphabet -- from the Paleo-Hebrew to the Aramaic alphabet,
reflecting their preference for communicating in Aramaic rather than in Hebrew. Source. In Babylon, they also translated the Paleo-Hebrew Scriptures into Chaldean (Babylonian) Aramaic. So, we therefore see the names of Babylonian gods inserted in place of the true and original names that GOD and Moses spoke. Chaldean Babylonian Aramaic replaced ancient Paleo-Hebrew and nearly all existing manuscripts, including the Masoretic text and the Dead Sea Scrolls are in Babylonian Aramaic. Jesus, the Apostles & the early Christian Church NEVER used or quoted from the King James Version Bible created in 1611 under influence of the Roman Catholic pope. Jesus, the Apostles and the early Christian Church NEVER used or quoted from any of the Masoretic Text which was copied, edited and distributed by a group of Jews known as the Masoretes between the 7th and 10th centuries A.D. But Jesus, the Apostles and early Christian Church DID use and quoted from the Greek Septuagint. The Masoretic text also leaves out entire books that were included in the Holy Greek Septuagint.
|
Yah refers to the Egyptian moon god. source 1, Source 2, Source 3 and is also related to Osiris the Egyptian god of the dead which i have recently been writing about. The Almighty GOD Creator of Heaven and Earth has been bringing all the pieces of the puzzle together, teaching and confirming these truths. During the Assyrian and Babylonian invasions of Israel, Jerusalem & Samaria, the Hebrew Peoples were not only carried off into Assyria and Babylon but also in Egypt. Also, much of the Assyrian and Babylonian beliefs came from ancient Egypt. Iah, transliterated as Yah, Jah, Jah(w), is a god of the moon in ancient Egyptian religion. His name simply means moon. By the New Kingdom he was less prominent as a moon deity than the other gods with lunar connections, Thoth and Khonsu. As a result of the functional connection between them he could be identified with either of those deities. Therefore, Iah or Yah can be identified with Thoth or Thot, a god of the moon. Refer back to Source 1 above and check out this next Source, you will need to very easily search their website for the word Thot. Iah (yah) also seems to have assumed the lunar aspect of Thoth, god of knowledge, writing and calculation; the segments of the moon were used as fractional symbols in writing. Certainly one of the most important aspects of Thot’s complex nature is that of a god of writing and of the SCRIBES. Thot is credited by the Ancient Egyptians with the invention of the hieroglyphic writing, the "words of god", evidenced in his epithet "the one who created writing". Therefore, it's easy to understand that Yah is the pagan god of pagan words & pagan scribes! He can often be seen holding a reed pen and a scribe's palette. Among his many epithets "lord of the reed pen" clearly shows his association with these attributes of writing. It is therefore not surprising to see the scribe's palette being presented to Thot, or one of the gods associated with him, in ritual scenes. Yah and Thoth is related to the pagan moon god named "Sin". Although the names of the Moon-god was Sin, Thot, Thoth, Yah, Pan, etc...., his title was al-ilah, meaning "THE Deity", meaning that he was considered THE chief god above all gods. The Moon-god called al- ilah was shortened to Allah. The pagans used "Allah" in the names they gave their children. Both Muhammad's father and uncle had "Allah" as part of their names. Source. Yah/Yahweh is none other than Allah, the islamic pagan moon god, the arch-enemy of the ONE ETERNAL ALMIGHTY GOD EHYEH ASHER EHYEH, JESUS THE CHRIST. If you will just keep reading this Entire Article and click on all links for all the Proof, you will see!
On March 12, 2013 i wrote in the newsletter about GOD showing me Osirus, then on March 15, 2013, i wrote in the newsletter about "Pan" the goat god. Then on April 24, 2013, GOD Almighty revealed to me that Pan is related to Yah. Yah also refers to a goat god. There was a vase found in the ancient city of Gat. Here is one artifact the Yahwist will not promote because it links the name "Yah" with that of the goat god. It appears the god-name Yah was a favorite among many pagan cultures. The Freemasons borrow this goat god for their own lodges and secret devotions. i personally know a very high level Freemason. he never refers to GOD as "Jesus". he always says "yeshua". Archaeology shows that the Israelites had no problem assimilating their God to the pagan gods and goddesses. "Yah" as an inscription, "Yah of Gat (Gath)," first surfaces in Canaan on a Late Bronze Age ewer found in a temple's debris at Lachish, NOT at Sinai. Archaeological record shows much proof that the god of the names Yah and Yahweh, the same god of the "star of david", is the same god of the pagans. Source 1, Reference 2, Reference 3, Source 4, Reference 5. CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE CONNECTIONS OF YAH TO BABYLON & ASSYRIA The 4 letter tetragammaton and all versions/translations of it (YHWH, YHVH, Yahweh/Jehovah/hallelujah) refer to witchcraft. Notice in the witchcraft tarot card that each letter of the 4 letter tetragrammaton are present between each letter of "tarot". When rotating the opposite direction, tarot would read tora. What is the 4 letter babylonian aramaic hebrew name doing on the wicca card? WITCHES CHANT THE 4 LETTERS OF THE TETRAGRAMMATON! Now, why would witches chant the letters of the True Sacred Name of the Almighty Creator GOD??? THEY WOULDN'T AND THEY DON'T! THEY ARE ACTUALLY CHANTING THE NAME OF THEIR PAGAN MOON GOD ALLAH/YHWH! Source 1, Source 2, source 3, Source 4. Seller of Satanic Jewelry, sells tarot card jewelry, Freemasonry jewelry and the star of david and the Tetragrammaton! The 4 letter tetragrammaton is also related to Nazism. Source. It is also connected with freemasonry. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3 which also includes proof against the invented name "Jehovah". The god of the tetragrammaton is bisexual androgynous which means both male and female. Source 1, Source 2. Yahweh connected to pagan theory of re-incarnation. Source. |
![]() Each Chaldean Letter of the 4 letter tetragrammaton are present on Witchcraft Tarot Card. |
Chart #4: Comparison of Paleo Hebrew and Greek![]() |
1=North Semitic alphabet (Paleo-Hebrew) 2=Earliest Greek character (9th-6th centuries B.C.) 4=Eastern branch (Ionic) 5=Eastern branch (Attic) 7=Western branch 9=Classic Greek 10=Names of the letters (those in parentheses =names of letters now discarded in classic Greek). Both Chart #4 (left) and Chart #1 (top of page) show that Greek and Paleo-Hebrew are closely related. Whereas "modern Hebrew" (& Strong's Concordance Hebrew) is closely related to Syrian and Aramaic. Greek and Paleo-Hebrew look AND sound almost identical. Notice also that Paleo-Hebrew did have vowels! The hebrewic roots sacred namer's claim that Hebrew did not have vowels. They are talking about "modern" Hebrew which is really Chaldean Aramaic and did not even exist during the lifetime of Moses! Paleo-Hebrew did have vowels and also had a "J" sound as well! The Truth is that Greek is much closer to the ancient language of the Bible than what modern Hebrew is. Jesus and the apostles used the Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament. It was often quoted in the New Testament by Jesus and the Apostle Paul. Jesus called himself the Alpha and Omega. Hebrew roots people may have a problem with Greek but Jesus did NOT have a problem with Greek! It was almost identical to the old Paleo-Hebrew! Greek and Old Hebrew look and sound alike. GOD has preserved His Word through the Greek Septuagint, what fragments we have of the Old Paleo-Hebrew and through the Alexanderian Text.
|
Let's learn more about the word "Jehovah". The suffix "hovah" is identical to #1943 in Strong's Dictionary and has the meaning of "ruin, mischief." It is another form of #1942, 'havvah', which is translated "calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wickedness." Put the two (Je + hovah) together and you get "God of ruin, mischief, calamity, perversion, and wickedness".
Let's examine Exodus 6:3 in the King James Version: "And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty (Elshaddai), but by My name JEHOVAH (originally EHYEH) was I not known to them".
In English, this verse does not make since because in Gen 22:14 Abraham supposedly called the name of the place where He was going to sacrifice Isaa "Jehovahjireh". "And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said [to] this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen". How could Abraham name the place after Jehovah if Exodus 6:3 says that Abraham had previously never known GOD by that name!
In Judges 2:11, it tells us that the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and served Baalim! Who is "Baalim"? Baalim is Strong's H1168 which IS THE SAME AS Strong's H1167.
In Hosea 2:16 it says "And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi (husband); and shalt call me no more Baali (a deity in the northern kingdom, variation of the name 'Baal')". "Baali" in this verse is H1180 which comes from 1167.
1180 is a symbolic name for Yah and Jehovah.
Therefore, the Bible tells us that the Israelites forsook the True GOD Ehyeh and served Baalim/Yah/Jehovah!
Hosea 2:17 "For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and they shall no more be remembered by their name." Context of verse 16-17 is pagan names! It is not talking about English titles of "lord". It is talking about the Babylonian Aramaic Hebrew names of Yah, Yehovah & Jehovah!
Click here to learn more history of the words Yah, Jah, Yaho, Y-ha-ho, Jah-Hovah, Yah-Havvah, Yah-Hovah and Jehovah. Yes, Yahoo is a pagan name! .
Click here for even more documentation on those words and YHWH
Jer. 23:26 How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart;
:27 Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.
Jer. 8:8 "How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain."
:9 "The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the Lord; and what wisdom is in them?"
Many people try to say that GOD would never allow anyone to corrupt His Holy Word and mis-translate the scriptures. Do we not have unholy translations today? Of course we do. The NIV was written by un-repentant, open homosexuals. The NIV is the official bible of the un-holy gay metropolitan church. It has been mis-translated. There are other translations called the Queen James Bible and other evil translations. GODs Word is Holy and Perfect. NOT corrupted. However, we DO have corrupted translations. The King James Version is just one more relatively modern corrupted translation of man. More and more modern translations are further twisting GODs Word based on their personal beliefs. What makes you think that man did not do the same thing in earlier generations? The original Scripture's were HOLY AND PURE. Man's translation's are not pure. The translation that the Israelites brought out of Babylon was not pure. GOD knew that people would add to and take away from the Original Scriptures and even placed a curse on those that would do it.
Rev. 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Consider also that the Scriptures were actually LOST and then found again in time of Josiah. 2 Kings 22
Objection: Claim; Jesus Spoke Aramaic.
FACT: Yes, Jesus spoke SOME Aramaic as it was a language of his time. There is nothing wrong with speaking a language. However, He also spoke Greek and did so MUCH more than what He did Aramaic. He used the Greek Septuagint Bible and quoted from it. He NEVER quoted any version of the babylonian pagan names that referred to allah the moon god.
Objection: Claim: islam was not invented until Muhammad.
FACT: Actually, islam existed in old testament times under different names. Muhammad just re-organized it and brought it into more modern times.
LORD= Baal?
Accusation: "Lord" means "Baal", the name of a false god or demon!
FACT: Actually, the word "lord" is a general title that refers to any master, ruler, owner, leader or husband. The word "lord" is never the actual name for any pagan god. Since, people worshipped false gods, they would of course call their gods by generic titles of lord and god. But these words do NOT refer specifically to any particular
deity. People try to point to the Hebrew (Aramaic) word "baal" which SOMETIMES does refer to a pagan deity. However, words can have different meanings in different contexts. We must also look at the original word, then the Aramaic translation and then the Greek and English translations. Just because a bad word was used in one of those translations doesn't mean that every word that ever replaces it is a also a bad word. The words "lord" and "God" are NOT names of pagan gods.
Baal is. Yhwh is. Yahweh is.
Lord is not. GOD is not.
"The fact is that the word "LORD" is a Hebrew word and comes from the Hebrew word "ADOWN" (Strongs #113 & 136 a king or sovereign) from which comes "ADONAI" which is a Hebrew word translated into the Septuagint Greek version of the Old Testament became "Kurios" and both are CORRECTLY translated "LORD" and this refers to kingship or sovereignty". Source.
The Word "GOD":
Accusation: The word "God" was originally used by the Teutonic peoples to refer to their heathen deities according to Websters Dictionary.
FACT: The word "God" is a title of anything that is worshipped. There is the True One Eternal GOD and there are false "gods". Some peoples god is their money. Just because one group of people or some groups of pagans used the word "god" in reference to their "god" doesn't mean the word always refers to false gods. When using the word "God", you know which God you are referring to and so does the person you are talking to and so does God. He knows who you are talking to. He does not mind you using titles when referring to Him, He gives Himself many titles. Anyone with great authority has many titles and names which can be used interchangeably such as Sir, Mister, President, etc. The greater the authority, the more names and titles that person has. This is also true in all of the spirit world.
1 Corinthians 8:5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)
6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
In the Holy Scriptures, "Elohim" is used over 200 times to designate FALSE gods. Some of the false gods designated by the word "Elohim" includes Baal, Chemosh, Dagon, Milcom, Nisroch and even the female goddess of sex, Ashtoreth. The word "gods" in the first commandment (Exodus 20:3) is "Elohim" in the orginal Hebrew.
Even the word "El", meaning "Mighty One", while used many places to refer to the true God, it is also used many times to refer to false gods. Examples: Exodus 15:11, 34:14 ; Deut. 32:12; Dan. 11:36.
Accusation: The English word "God" comes from an old Syrian deity "Gawd" and is referred to as Gad in Isa. 65:11 see margin.
FACT: There is NO authority for such a statement. This is no more true than to claim that the Polish word "Bog" came from our English word "bog". To them, the word means an object or being of worship, but to us it means a marshy piece of ground. As for "Gad", one of Jacob's twelve sons was named Gad and thus one of the tribes of Israel is named Gad. Gen. 30:11; Rev. 7:5. One of Gods prophets in Davids day was named "Gad". 2 Sam.24:11-19. The word "Gad" has a favorable place in the Sacred Scriptures, even though there was also a heathen god by that name mentioned in Isa. 65:11; and furthermore there is NO evidence of a connection between the word "Gad" and our English word "God".
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/god
Main Entry: 1 god
Pronunciation: \ˈgäd also ˈgȯd\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German got god
Date: before 12th century
1 capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind
2 : a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality
3 : a person or thing of supreme value
4 : a powerful ruler
The following is from: http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/god
Definition: God
Noun
1. The supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in monotheistic religions.
2. Any supernatural being worshipped as controlling some part of the world or some aspect of life or who is the personification of a force.
3. A man of such superior qualities that he seems like a deity to other people; "he was a god among men".
4. A material effigy that is worshipped as a god; "thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image"; "money was his god".
Date "God" was first used in popular English literature: sometime before 990. (references)
Etymology: God \God\ (g[o^]d), noun. [Anglo-Saxon god; akin to Old Saxon & Dutch god, Old High German got, German gott, Icelandic gu[eth], go[eth], Swedish & Danish gud, Gothic gup, probably orig. a past participle from a root appearing in Sanskrit h[=u], past participle h[=u]ta, to call upon, invoke, implore. Compare to Goodbye, Gosp. (references)
Jesus = Zeus???
Accusation: Jesus is a heathen name of the false Greek god, Zeus, shortened - Je-zeus. We have been ignorantly worshipping a pagan god as Savior.
FACT: ...There is not a single authority in dictionary or any other historical source book that even hints at a possibility of the word "Jesus" having any connection with the Greek god, Zeus. Here are the facts.
The Encyclopedia Brittanica gives the following, Article "Jesus". "The word Jesus is the form assumed in Latin by the Greek Iesous, which is the transliterated form of the Hebrew Jehoshua, Jeshua or Joshua...."
In short, "Jesus" is the Greek from of the Hebrew word "Joshua". The word was in common usage in the days of our Saviour's stay on the earth. Many of the Jews had been using Greek as their language for 300 years."
The following is from: http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/jesus
Jesus (1.) Joshua, the son of Nun (Acts 7:45; Heb. 4:8; R.V., "Joshua"). (2.) A Jewish Christian surnamed Justus (Col. 4:11). Je'sus, the proper, as Christ is the official, name of our Lord. To distinguish him from others so called, he is spoken of as "Jesus of Nazareth" (John 18:7), and "Jesus the son of Joseph" (John 6:42). This is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Joshua, which was originally Hoshea (Num. 13:8, 16), but changed by Moses into Jehoshua (Num. 13:16; 1 Chr. 7:27), or Joshua. After the Exile it assumed the form Jeshua, whence the Greek form Jesus.
You can read more about the "j'zeus" eror at http://www.scribd.com/doc/7239693/Jesus-and-Zeus
Other Names for GOD: He has MANY Names:
Hebrewic Roots Sacred name groups say He only has one name and they know that name, YET they are going by a Babylonian Translation of the Scriptures! They spend money, time and energy on learning what they think is the Hebrew language when actually they are learning Chaldean!
Rev.19:12 says He has a name that no man knows! Rev. 19 uses THREE "name"'s for Him! One is the one that "No man knows", one is "Word of God" and What name will be written on Him when He returns?
Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.
The scriptures uses other names for Him as well:
Matt. 1:23 Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us."
But He is not limited to ONE name. He has MANY names including Emmanuel, but yet you don't see anyone going around saying you must call him by that name.
Isa. 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Other names/titles for THE ONE GOD:
Elohim, Lord, Master, Lion of Judah, Alpha and Omega, Bread of Life, Savior, Redeemer, High Priest, Truth, Rock, Messiah, Deliverer, Healer, Foundation, Word, King.
Acts 2:38 And Peter said to them, 'Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Acts 8:16 For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Acts 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
Acts 19:5 When they heard [this], they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Blasmephying GOD!
-In the Hebrewic Roots Movement, When a yah name believer uses the spelling "G_d", they are saying
that "God" is pagan, thus "God" is condemnable or damnable. Thus they
are truly saying G.D., that is, the bad curse word that no one should ever use!
-To completely stop using the words "Jesus", "God" and throw your bible away are MAJOR steps! Something that should only be done after as much research as going to Israel or somewheres and living there a year or more with a expert and truly knowing what you are talking about OR being visited by an angel OR some other direct confirmation from God OR being very certain with NO way of accepting Jesus and God any more. It must be certain. OR else risk the Wrath of God! To truly keep/observe such a doctrine, you must be as certain about it as you are the fact that christmas is pagan and without dispute.
Jesus is NOT a 4-letter word! How dare anyone to try to turn it into a 4-letter word! Shame on anyone who causes confusion in the church and say that JESUS is a 4-letter word in reference to false gods or the evil one! Jesus is not the evil one! Jesus is the Saviour. Any doctrine that tries to say anything else is not of THE ALMIGHTY!
I was not confused in my mind and had a great relationship with God in Light until the spirit of religious confusion came against me and my spirit and caused darkness in my life because of the so called sacred names issue, causing me and many others to doubt who they were praying to. I KNOW darkness. Unfortunately I have had more to do with darkness in my life than most people on this planet. But I tell you one thing right here and right now, that I felt much darkness come against me when the yah groups caused my mind to be oppressed with darkness and confusion. People have gotten so caught up with RESEARCH and knowledge that they have forgotten to test the spirits. They say it is confusion to speak with the Gift of the Holy Ghost of speaking in unknown tongues. They say it is confusion to shout praises to God. They say it is confusion to testify in front of a congregation about what God has done for them. But yet they do NOT claim confusion when they tell people that they are praying to demons by pronouncing the name of Jesus in modern day English! Even though I will lose the support of many of you, I must proclaim that there is Peace in the name of Jesus Christ! The Lord has confirmed this to me many times over! You need to give up your own understandings (Proverbs 3:5-6) and all your internet pages and reference books and stop and listen to His Voice! What is He telling you?
Question: What Bible do we have that is the most accurate? What Bible should we use?
Answer: Since most people in the United States use the King James Version, it is important that we all have a copy and know it intensely. Whenever you try to share the Truth with anyone about any subject, they will always try to claim that you are wrong just because of what Bible Translation you are using. So use the KJV. However, you also need a copy of the Greek Septuagint of the Old Testament. That is THE BIBLE that Jesus and the Apostles used. If you cannot speak Greek, then you will need a English Translation copy. i do NOT receive ANY money for linking to that product. The English Translation of the Greek Septuagint is not 100% Perfect but it is still better than the King James.
i also recommend the English Standard Version (ESV), Revised Standard Version (RSV), the American Standard Version (ASV) or the New American Standand Version (NASV) because they NEVER use the words "yah, jah, yahweh, Jehovah, Alleluia, easter". They also correctly translate 1 John 5:7-8 without adding exter words that the KJV added. However, they do use the word "hallelujah". None of these translations are 100% perfect to the Original Scriptures but they do come closer than the KJV which was produced only because the pope hated the Geneva Bible. The pope and the Church of England wanted a bible that everyone would accept under their religious bondage control. They added more corruption into the text.
Question: Should we still use the Strong's Concordance?
Answer: Yes. Not all Aramaic words are evil. Only those that point specifically to pagan gods. We should not use the specific names of pagan gods (demons) in place of the Holy Names of The One True Eternal GOD. Strong's can actually be helpful in pointing out which names are the evil ones.
More Confirmations after inital release of Article:
On May 14, 2013, the date of releasing this article, i also received my very first copy of the Greek Septuagint, translated into English by Sir Lancelot C.L. Brenton. First Published in 1851. 14th printing May 2011. After releasing the article and having returned home to rest and read, i discovered to my surprise in the Preface of the book, it states "It has been preserved in a large number of manuscript copies of the original, and the Greet text in Brenton's edition is based on VATICANUS, and early fourth-century manuscript, with some reliance on other texts...". That is a major Confirmation to me because as i have written, GOD showed me the Codex Vaticanus contains the true meaning of 666. i had even place that information at the very bottom of the article. So now, i am able to place this confirmation right under that. Even the date of May 14 for me to recieve the book is confirmation as GOD uses the number 14 to confirm and reveal certain things to me. i am NOT into numberology. But GOD does use numbers significantly in the Bible. Also, this particular printing of this edition was in May and was the 14th Printing! Wow, Praise GOD for these continued Confirmations.
ANOTHER CONFIRMATION: May 15, 2013: GOD provides many copies of New American Standand Version (NASV)
Today, to my surprise, GOD made available to me MANY copies of the NASV for the low cost of 3 for $1.99. At that price, there are at least $44.00 worth that i can buy to give out to people! i might even be able to get a discount on that price as well. GOD does Confirm! GOD does speak to His People. HE is Real and Alive! Will you hear what The Spirit is saying to the Churches?
SPECIAL THANKS
A Special Thanks to Pastor Cohen G. Reckart who has answered my questions and gave me permission to use information and charts, etc from his website. Thank GOD for leading me to his website which has been instrumental in opening my eyes. His website offers MUCH more information for your more extensive research.
RECOMMENDED READING:
(i do not necessarily agree with every article and every word on these websites. But i do endorse these particular articles)
-The Sacred name study at www.yahwehism.com
-Meaning of the Name JESUS at WhyApostolic.com
-The Hebrew Bible Moses Couldn’t Read
-Masoretic Text vs. Original Hebrew
-Online Bible showing the Paleo-Hebrew with modern Hebrew comparison and Hebrew Transliterated with modern English versions compared.
-Jesus or Yeshua at Evangelical Outreach.org
-What text type or types do the most early church fathers use? Alexandrian versus Byzantium
-Questions For Those Who Believe In Only The KJV
-The Law Versus The Blood
-The Pitfalls of the Hebrewic Roots Movement
-HISTORY OF MYSTERY BABYLON, ISLAM, CATHOLIC CHURCH, CHRISLAM AND THE MODERN DAY FALSE PROPHET REVEALED
